Skipping one or more dialysis sessions significantly increases mortality: measuring the impact of non-adherence

  • Eduardo Gottlieb Fresenius Medical Care, Buenos Aires
  • Adriana Tessey Fresenius Medical Care, Buenos Aires
  • Roberto Tanús Fresenius Medical Care, Buenos Aires
  • Susana Hecker Fresenius Medical Care, Buenos Aires
  • Juan Carlos Díaz Fernández Fresenius Medical Care, Buenos Aires
Keywords: renal dialysis, frequency, nonadherence, mortality

Abstract

Introduction: Non-adherence to the prescribed dialysis sessions frequency ranges from 2% to 50% of patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of detecting and measuring the non-adherence to the prescribed dialysis frequency and to determine the importance of a multidisciplinary approach with the aim of improving adherence. Methods: longitudinal cohort study including 8,164 prevalent hemodialysis patients in April 2010, with more than 90 days of treatment, in Fresenius Medical Care Argentina units that were monitored for 3 years. The survey evaluated: interruption of at least one dialysis session in a month or reduction at least 10 minutes of a dialysis session in a month, during 6 months prior to the survey. Relative mortality risks were evaluated among groups. Results: 648 patients (7.9%) interrupted dialysis sessions: 320 (3.9%) interrupted one session per month and 328 (4.01%) interrupted more than one session per month. After 3 years monitoring, 349 patients (53.8 %) remained active in hemodialysis and 299 were inactive due to different reasons: 206 deceased (31.8 %), 47 transfers or monitoring losses (7.25 %), 36 transplanted (5.55 %), 8 changes to PD modality (1.2%) and 2 recovered their kidney function (0.3 %).Interrupting one session per month significantly increased the mortality risk comparing both groups (interrupters and non-interrupters): RR 2.65 (IC 95% 2.24 – 3.14). Interrupting more than one dialysis session also increased significantly mortality risk comparing to the non-interrupters: RR 2.8 (IC 95% 2.39 – 3.28). After 3 years monitoring, 41.6 % of interrupters at the beginning had improved their adherence through a multidisciplinary program of quality improvement. Conclusion: Global mortality was greater among patients who interrupted dialysis sessions. A considerable proportion of interrupter patients at the beginning modified their behavior through the implementation of a multidisciplinary program of quality improvement.

References

Bame SI, Petersen N, Wray NP. Variation in hemodialysis patient compliance according to demographic characteristics. Soc Sci Med. 1993;37(8):1035-43.

Bleyer AJ, Hylander B, Sudo H, Nomoto Y, de la Torre E, Chen RA, et al. An international study of patient compliance with hemodialysis. JAMA. 1999;281(13):1211-3.

Christensen AJ, Benotsch EG, Wiebe JS, Lawton WJ. Coping with treatment-related stress: effects on patient adherence in hemodialysis. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1995;63(3):454-9.

Collins AJ, Kasiske B, Herzog C, Chen SC, Everson S, Constantini E, et al. Excerpts from the United States Renal Data System 2003 Annual Data Report: atlas of end-stage renal disease in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003;42(6 Suppl 5):A5-7, S1-230.

Denhaerynck K, Manhaeve D, Dobbels F, Garzoni D, Nolte C, De Geest S. Prevalence and consequences of nonadherence to hemodialysis regimens. Am J Crit Care. 2007;16(3):222-35.

Hecking E1, Bragg-Gresham JL, Rayner HC, Pisoni RL, Andreucci VE, Combe C, et al. Haemodialysis prescription, adherence and nutritional indicators in five European countries: results from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS). Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2004;19(1):100-7.

Kaveh K, Kimmel PL. Compliance in hemodialysis patients: multidimensional measures in search of a gold standard. Am J Kidney Dis. 2001;37(2):244-66.

Kimmel PL, Peterson RA, Weihs KL, Simmens SJ, Alleyne S, Cruz I, et al. Psychosocial factors, behavioral compliance and survival in urban hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int. 1998;54(1):245-54.

Kutner NG, Zhang R, McClellan WM, Cole SA. Psychosocial predictors of non-compliance in haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2002;17(1):93-9.

Leggat JE Jr, Orzol SM, Hulbert-Shearon TE, Golper TA, Jones CA, Held PJ, et al. Noncompliance in hemodialysis: predictors and survival analysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 1998;32(1):139-45.

Moist LM, Bragg-Gresham JL, Pisoni RL, Saran R, Akiba T, Jacobson SH, et al. Travel time to dialysis as a predictor of health-related quality of life, adherence, and mortality: the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS). Am J Kidney Dis. 2008;51(4):641-50.

Obialo CI, Bashir K, Goring S, Robinson B, Quarshie A, Al-Mahmoud A, et al. Dialysis "no-shows" on saturdays: implications of the weekly hemodialysis schedules on nonadherence and outcomes. J Natl Med Assoc. 2008;100(4):412-9.

Port FK, Pisoni RL, Bragg-Gresham JL, Satayathum SS, Young EW, Wolfe RA, et al. DOPPS estimates of patient life years attributable to modifiable hemodialysis practices in the United States. Blood Purif. 2004;22(1):175-80.

Saran R, Bragg-Gresham JL, Rayner HC, Goodkin DA, Keen ML, Van Dijk PC, et al. Nonadherence in hemodialysis: associations with mortality, hospitalization, and practice patterns in the DOPPS. Kidney Int. 2003;64(1):254-62.

Saran R, Canaud BJ, Depner TA, Keen ML, McCullough KP, Marshall MR, et al. Dose of dialysis: key lessons from major observational studies and clinical trials. Am J Kidney Dis. 2004;44(5 Suppl 2):47-53.

Vanholder R, Massy Z, Argiles A, Spasovski G, Verbeke F, Lameire N, et al. Chronic kidney disease as cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005;20(6):1048-56.

Published
2014-06-01
How to Cite
1.
Gottlieb E, Tessey A, Tanús R, Hecker S, Díaz Fernández JC. Skipping one or more dialysis sessions significantly increases mortality: measuring the impact of non-adherence. Rev Nefrol Dial Traspl. [Internet]. 2014Jun.1 [cited 2024Jul.16];34(2):62-0. Available from: http://revistarenal.org.ar/index.php/rndt/article/view/106
Section
Original Article