Reliability and validity of the turkish version of the self-management scale for kidney transplant recipients

  • Çiğdem Erdem Faculty of Health Science, Süleyman Demirel Universitesi, Çünür/Isparta, Turkey
  • Fatma Cebeci Faculty of Nursing, Head of the Surgical Nursing Department, Akdeniz Universitesi, Hemşirelik Fakültesi, Antalya, Turkey
Keywords: kidney transplantation, self-management, scale validity and reliability

Abstract

Introduction: Self-management is defined as the active participation of individuals in their own treatment processes. Kidney transplant recipients to participate in their care are important in terms of the graft survival and their general health. Objective: The aim of this study was, therefore, to establish the Turkish reliability and validity of the Self-Management Scale for Kidney Transplant Recipients. Methods: Data were collected using a “Patient Introduction Form” and the Self-Management Scale for Kidney Transplant Recipients. Number, percentage, mean, standard deviation, content validity index, factor analysis, test-retest, correlation analysis and Cronbach’s alpha were used. Results: Scale adaptation method recommended by the World Health Organization was used. The item content validity index was 0.99, the scale content validity index was 0.93, and both were 1.00 in terms of content. Exploratory factor analysis was used, which revealed 3 factors with loadings ranging from 0.42 to 0.79. Reliability coefficient was 0.73. Test-retest reliability was statistically significant (p=<0.05). Conclusions: The turkish version of self-management scale for kidney transplant recipients is a valid, reliable, and complementary tool. Healthcare professionals can use it to assess kidney transplant recipients’ self-management skills.

References

1) Turquía. Ministry of Health. Organ transplant waiting list and transplantations statistics in the Turkey 2018 [Internet]. Disponible en: https://organkds.saglik.gov.tr/ (consulta: 18/02/2021).

2) Urstad KH. Patient Education for Renal Transplant Recipients [Tesis doctoral]. Oslo: Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, 2013. Disponible en: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/30829991.pdf (consulta: 18/02/2021).

3) Ding D. Post-kidney transplant rejection and infection complications. Nephrol Nurs J. 2010;37(4):419-26.

4) Berben L, Denhaerynck K, Dobbels F, Engberg S, Vanhaecke J, Crespo-Leiro MG, et al.; BRIGHT study consortium. Building research initiative group: chronic illness management and adherence in transplantation (BRIGHT) study: study protocol. J Adv Nurs. 2015;71(3):642-54. doi: 10.1111/jan.12519.

5) Lin SY, Fetzer SJ, Lee PC, Chen CH. Predicting adherence to health care recommendations using health promotion behaviours in kidney transplant recipients within 1-5 years post-transplant. J Clin Nurs. 2011;20(23-24):3313-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03757.x.

6) Bodenheimer T, Lorig K, Holman H, Grumbach K. Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. JAMA. 2002;288(19):2469-75. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.19.2469.

7) Lorig KR, Holman H. Self-management education: history, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms. Ann Behav Med. 2003;26(1):1-7. doi: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2601_01.

8) Grady PA, Gough LL. Self-management: a comprehensive approach to management of chronic conditions. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(8):e25-31. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302041.

9) Moore SM, Schiffman R, Waldrop-Valverde D, Redeker NS, McCloskey DJ, Kim MT, et al. Recommendations of common data elements to advance the science of self-management of chronic conditions. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2016;48(5):437-47. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12233.

10) Haspeslagh A, De Bondt K, Kuypers D, Naesens M, Breunig C, Dobbels F. Completeness and satisfaction with the education and information received by patients immediately after kidney transplant: a mixed-models study. Prog Transplant. 2013;23(1):12-22. doi: 10.7182/pit2013249.

11) Schmid-Mohler G, Schäfer-Keller P, Frei A, Fehr T, Spirig R. A mixed-method study to explore patients' perspective of self-management tasks in the early phase after kidney transplant. Prog Transplant. 2014;24(1):8-18. doi: 10.7182/pit2014728.

12) Kobus G, Małyszko J, Małyszko JS, Puza E, Bachórzewska-Gajewska H, Myśliwiec M. Compliance with lifestyle recommendations in kidney allograft recipients. Transplant Proc. 2011;43(8):2930-4. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.08.031.

13) Kosaka S, Tanaka M, Sakai T, Tomikawa S, Yoshida K, Chikaraishi T, et al. Development of self-management scale for kidney transplant recipients, including management of post-transplantation chronic kidney disease. ISRN Transplantation. 2013;2013:1-7. doi: 10.5402/2013/619754.

14) Khezerloo S, Mahmoudi H, Vafadar Z. Evaluating the psychometric properties of the persian self-management scale for kidney transplant recipients. Urol J. 2019;16(2):186-192. doi: 10.22037/uj.v0i0.4339.

15) Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2006;29(5):489-97. doi: 10.1002/nur.20147.

16) Atkinson TM, Rosenfeld BD, Sit L, Mendoza TR, Fruscione M, Lavene D, et al. Using confirmatory factor analysis to evaluate construct validity of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011;41(3):558-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.05.008.

17) Çapik C. Use of confirmatory factor analysis in validity and reliability studies. Anadolu Hemsirelik Saglik Bilimleri Derg. 2014;17(3):196--205.

18) Büyüköztürk Ş. Data Analysis Guidebook for Social Sciences: Statistics, Research Design, SPSS-Applications and Interpretation. 18th ed. Ankara: Pegem Akademi, 2013.

19) Çokluk Ö, Şekercioğlu G, Büyüköztürk Ş. Multivariate Statistic for Social Sciences: SPSS and LISREL Applications. 2th ed. Ankara: Pegem Akademi, 2012.

20) Pourmand G, Dehghani S, Rahmati MR, Mehrsai A, Gooran S, Alizadeh F, et al. Does hypertension remain after kidney transplantation? Acta Med Iran. 2015;53(5):297-300.

21) Saint-Remy A, Somja M, Gellner K, Weekers L, Bonvoisin C, Krzesinski JM. Urinary and dietary sodium, and potassium associated with blood pressure control in treated hypertensive kidney transplant recipients: an observational study. BMC Nephrol. 2012;13:121. doi: 10.1186/1471-2369-13-121.

22) Soypacaci Z, Sengul S, Yıldız EA, Keven K, Kutlay S, Erturk S, et al. Effect of daily sodium intake on post-transplant hypertension in kidney allograft recipients. Transplant Proc. 2013;45(3):940-3. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.02.050.

23) Brown IJ, Tzoulaki I, Candeias V, Elliott P. Salt intakes around the world: implications for public health. Int J Epidemiol. 2009;38(3):791-813. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyp139.

24) Veater NL, East L. Exploring depression amongst kidney transplant recipients: a literature review. J Ren Care. 2016;42(3):172-84. doi: 10.1111/jorc.12162.
Published
2022-06-14
How to Cite
1.
Erdem Çiğdem, Cebeci F. Reliability and validity of the turkish version of the self-management scale for kidney transplant recipients. Rev Nefrol Dial Traspl. [Internet]. 2022Jun.14 [cited 2024Dec.27];42(2):117-23. Available from: http://revistarenal.org.ar/index.php/rndt/article/view/789
Section
Original Article