Progression of focal lupus nephritis with extracapillary proliferation after one year

  • José Lucas Daza López División Nefrología, Hospital de Clínicas José de San Martín, Buenos Aires
  • Fernando Segovia División Nefrología, Hospital de Clínicas José de San Martín, Buenos Aires
  • Daiana Abeledo Servicio de Clínica Médica, Sanatorio Otamendi, Buenos Aires
  • Marcelo De Rosa División Nefrología, Hospital de Clínicas José de San Martín, Buenos Aires
  • Alicia Marini División Nefrología, Hospital de Clínicas José de San Martín, Buenos Aires
  • Hernán Sarzuri Marca División Nefrología, Hospital de Clínicas José de San Martín, Buenos Aires
Keywords: proliferative lupus nephritis, glomerular injury, extracapillary proliferation, glomerulonephritis membranoproliferative

Abstract

Introduction: Although focal lupus nephritis (FLN) with extracapillary proliferation (ECP) is usually found in renal biopsies, little is known about its course. This study was carried out to investigate the correlation of clinical, histological and laboratory findings in these patients’ progress. Objective: To analyze focal or diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis biopsies (class III and IV, according to WHO) and their development regarding the level of extracapillary proliferation throughout a period of 10 years at Hospital de Clínicas José de San Martín. Methods: In this retrospective observational study, 147 patients with class III or IV GN were observed for 10 years. According to the degree of extracapillary proliferation, they were divided into the following groups: group 1 (5%-<25% of crescents, n=33), group 2 (25%-50% of crescents, n=34) and group 3 [>50% of crescents, i.e. diffuse proliferative nephritis (DPN), n=20]. Patients suffering from class III and IV lupus nephritis with no extracapillary proliferation formed the control group (n=60). After one year, clinical and laboratory findings as well as the development of the condition among the four groups were compared to assess their level of remission. Complete remission was considered as defined in KDIGO 2012 Guideline. A univariate logistic regression analysis and a subsequent multivariate one were performed. Results: There were 124 women (84.35%) and 23 men (15.65%) with an average age of 35±10. The average age in the control group was 32±10. The univariate analysis showed a greater number of patients who achieved complete remission in the control group with an odds ratio of 0.05 (0.02-0.12) p=0.001, whereas in the 3 groups with extracapillary proliferation fewer patients reached this state, even in group 1, which had an odds ratio of 7.61 (2.42-23.9) and p=0.001. The multivariate analysis revealed that the persistent protein in the urine after 6 months was statistically significant for not achieving complete remission, the odds ratio being 2.81 (1.58-5.0) and p=0.001. Conclusion: The presence of various degrees of crescent formation in class III and IV proliferative lupus nephritis (PLN) shown in the histological findings and the persistent protein in the urine at 6 months constitute independent factors for not achieving complete remission after one year.

References

Tang Z, Yao X, Hu W, Zeng C, Chen H, Liu Z, et al. The clinical and pathological characteristics of Chinese patients with pauci-immune crescent glomerulonephritis. Chin Med J (Engl). 2001;114(4):374-8.

Baqi N, Moazami S, Singh A, Ahmad H, Balachandra S, Tejani A. Lupus nephritis in children: a longitudinal study of prognostic factors and therapy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1996;7(6):924-9.

Cameron JS. Lupus nephritis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1999;10(2):413-24.

Tang Z, Wang Z, Zhang HT, Hu WX, Zeng CH, Chen HP, et al. Clinical features and renal outcome in lupus patients with diffuse crescentic glomerulonephritis. Rheumatol Int. 2009;30(1):45-9.

Oudah N, Al Duhailib Z, Alsaad K, Qurashi S, Ghamdi G, Flaiw A, et al. Glomerulonephritis with crescents among adult Saudi patients outcome and its predictors. Clin Exp Med. 2012;12(2):121-5.

Hochberg MC. Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1997;40(9):1725.

Weening JJ, D’Agati VD, Schwartz MM, Seshan SV, Alpers CE, Appel GB, et al. The classification of glomerulonephritis in systemic lupus erythematosus revisited. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15(2):241-50.

Austin HA 3rd, Muenz LR, Joyce KM, Antonovych TT, Balow JE. Diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis: identification of specific pathologic features affecting renal outcome. Kidney Int. 1984;25(4):689-95.

Haas M, Rastaldi MP, Fervenza FC. Histologic classification of glomerular diseases: clinicopathologic correlations, limitations exposed by validation studies, and suggestions for modification. Kidney Int.

;85(4):779-93.

Masani NN, Imbriano LJ, D’Agati VD, Markowitz GS. SLE and rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2005;45(5):950-5.

Yu F, Tan Y, Liu G, Wang SX, Zou WZ, Zhao MH. Clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes of patients with crescentic lupus nephritis. Kidney Int. 2009;76(3):307-17.

Chen S, Tang Z, Zhang Y, Liu Z, Zhang H, Hu W, et al. Significance of histological crescent formation in patients with diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis. Am J Nephrol. 2013;38(6):445-52.

Hahn BH, McMahon MA, Wilkinson A, Wallace WD, Daikh DI, Fitzgerald JD, et al. American College of Rheumatology guidelines for screening, treatment, and management of lupus nephritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012;64(6):797-808.

Published
2017-05-26
How to Cite
1.
Daza López JL, Segovia F, Abeledo D, De Rosa M, Marini A, Sarzuri Marca H. Progression of focal lupus nephritis with extracapillary proliferation after one year. Rev Nefrol Dial Traspl. [Internet]. 2017May26 [cited 2024Jul.16];36(3):148-54. Available from: http://revistarenal.org.ar/index.php/rndt/article/view/70
Section
Original Article