Urgent-start on peritoneal dialysis
Abstract
Introduction: Peritoneal dialysis is under-used in many countries. Usually the admission of acute patients to renal replacement therapy are directed to HD. Urgent start of peritoneal dialysis offers a safe and efficient option to avoid the use of central venous catheters and to increase peritoneal dialysis use. Material and methods: It is a retrospective, observational study comparing patients who started urgent peritoneal dialysis with those that started dialysis in the conventional way, after 4 weeks. Results: 12 peritoneal dialysis patients were analyzed. Six of them under urgent start and the other six received the conventional procedure- Follow-up period was shorter for patients receiving urgent start. There were not significant differences between both groups concerning: age, sex, initial volume, KT/V, albumin, urea, calcium, phosphorus, ferritin, PCR and type of catheter. PTH was significantly lower in patients who received urgent start PD (P≤0.047). Regarding complications: two patients presented leakage of peritoneal fluid and one patient had wall bruising, in the urgent start group. Complications were solved with adequate treatments and did not cause change of methods. Discussion: Urgent start to peritoneal dialysis is a safe method and does not involve major complications. It is a strategy to decrease the use of hemodialysis catheters and to increase number of patients on dialysis peritoneal programs.References
Tam P. Peritoneal dialysis and preservation of residual renal function. Perit Dial Int. 2009;29(suppl 2):S108-10.
Collins AJ, Foley RN, Herzog C, Chavers B, Gilbertson D, Ishani A, et al. US Renal Data System 2010 Annual Data Report. Am J Kidney Dis. 2011;57 (1 Suppl 1):A8, e1-526.
Instituto Nacional Central Único Coordinador de Ablación e Implante. Sistema Nacional de Información de Procuración y Trasplante de la República Argentina. Registro Nacional de Insuficiencia Renal Crónica Terminal (IRCT). [Datos recolectados mayo 2015].
Ghaffari A. Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis: a quality improvement report. Am J Kidney Dis. 2012;59(3):400-8.
Metcalfe W, Khan IH, Prescott GJ, Simpson K, Macleod AM. Hospitalization in the first year of renal replacement therapy for end-stage renal disease. Q JM. 2003;96(12):899-909.
Dhingra RK1, Young EW, Hulbert-Shearon TE, Leavey SF, Port FK. Type of vascular access and mortality in U.S. hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2001;60(4):1443-51.
Ghaffari A1, Kumar V, Guest S. Infrastructur requirements for an urgent-start peritoneal dialysis program. Perit Dial Int. 2013;33(6):611-7.
Yang YF, Wang HJ, Yeh CC, Lin HH, Huang CC. Early initiation of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in patients undergoing surgical implantation of Tenckhoff catheters. Perit Dial Int. 2011;31(5):551-7.
Lobbedez T, Lecouf A, Ficheux M, Henri P, Hurault de Ligny B, Ryckelynck JP. Is rapid initiation of peritoneal dialysis feasible in unplanned dialysis patients? A single-centre experience. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008;23(10):3290-4.
Koch M, Kohnle M, Trapp R, Haastert B, Rump LC, Aker S. Comparable outcome of acute unplanned peritoneal dialysis and haemodialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012;27(1):375-80.