Survival in dialysis in relation to work

  • Daniel Fierro Centro de Hemodiálisis San Martín, General San Martín, Mendoza
  • Mateo Seguí Centro de Hemodiálisis San Martín, General San Martín, Mendoza
  • Guillermo Machado Centro de Hemodiálisis San Martín, General San Martín, Mendoza
  • Walter Jaliff Centro de Hemodiálisis San Martín, General San Martín, Mendoza
  • Alejandro Bazzetta Centro de Hemodiálisis San Martín, General San Martín, Mendoza
Keywords: quality of life, survival life expectancy, renal dialysis, hemodialysis, occupational therapy, work

Abstract

Introduction: Little is known about the impact of the occupational situation on the mortality of patients on maintenance hemodialysis. Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate de impact and importance of paid occupational therapy. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 291 patients over 19 years. Patients were divided in 4 groups: Not able (NA), because of the degree of deterioration for realizing occupational tasks; Incidental or informal work (IW): those that being in adequate psychophysical conditions to work in a regular form, were not doing it; formal work (FW), that is to say external, paid work and last, paid occupational therapy (POT), work in dependence relationship in the same dialysis clinic. Results: The patients classified as NA presented the least survival 4.25 +- 0.56 years. With respect to the other groups, age as the presence of diabetes affected survival. Of the other three groups, the mean treatmentime was for IW 7.23+- 0.71 y; FW 8.11+- 0.62 y vs POT 11.69 +- 1.24 y. A significant difference was found between NA and IW vs FW and POT. Conclusions: The occupational situation in hemodialysis is clearly related to mortality. The impact of dialysis on the different groups is more due to the primary diseases than the dialectic treatment. We believe that the variable working condition should be included to compare different populations. The inclusion of the patient in the group POT places him in a better situation with respect to his perspective of living.

References

Ferri FF. Ferri’s clinical advisor: instant diagnosis and treatment. St. Louis: Mosby, 2011.

Schatell D, Thompson N, Oberley E. Life Options Patient Opinion Study identifies keys to a long life for dialysis patients. Nephrol News Issues. 1999;13(4):24-6.

Seguí JM, Fierro HD, Machado GR, Fernández R. Mejoría en la calidad de vida de pacientes hemodializados crónicos a través de la terapia ocupacional remunerada (TOR) o trabajo benévolo. Nuestra experiencia. Rev Nefrol Diál Traspl. 2003;23(3):121-6.

Blake C, Codd MB, Cassidy A, O'Meara YM. Physical function, employment and quality of life in end-stage renal disease. J Nephrol. 2000;13(2):142-9.

Curtin RB, Klag MJ, Bultman DC, Schatell D. Renal rehabilitation and improved patient outcomes in Texas dialysis facilities. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002;40(2):331-8.

Oberley ET, Sadler JH, Alt PS. Renal rehabilitation: obstacles, progress, and prospects for the future. Am J Kidney Dis. 2000;35(4 Suppl 1):S141-7.

van Manen JG, Korevaar JC, Dekker FW, Reuselaars MC, Boeschoten EW, Krediet RT. Changes in employment status in end-stage renal disease patients during their first year of dialysis. Perit Dial Int. 2001;21(6):595-601.

Kutner NG, Brogan D, Fielding B. Employment status and ability to work among working-age chronic dialysis patients. Am J Nephrol. 1991;11(4):334-40.

Published
2012-09-01
How to Cite
1.
Fierro D, Seguí M, Machado G, Jaliff W, Bazzetta A. Survival in dialysis in relation to work. Rev Nefrol Dial Traspl. [Internet]. 2012Sep.1 [cited 2024Dec.23];32(3):146-52. Available from: http://revistarenal.org.ar/index.php/rndt/article/view/218
Section
Original Article