Consensus Document. Implication of proteinuria in the diagnosis and monitoring of the chronic kidney disease (CKD)

  • Felipe Inserra
  • Margarita Angerosa
  • Jorge R. Alegre
  • Alberto Alles
  • María Eugenia Bianchi
  • Enrique Dorado
  • María Cecilia Etchegoyen
  • Alicia Fayad
  • Gustavo Greloni
  • Daniel Mazziotta
  • Graciela Pennacchiotti
  • Guillermo Rosa Diez
  • Santiago Torales
  • María Lía Torres
  • Federico Varela
  • Alberto Villagra
Keywords: chronic renal disease, diagnosis of CKD, proteinuria, albuminuria, creatinin, albumin/creatinin ratio in urine, protein/creatinin ratio in urine

Abstract

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a clinical entity secondary to multiple etiologies, characterized for being still in early stages and, without an adequate treatment, it frequently follows a progressive course that leads to an irreversible failure of the organ function and requires a substitute treatment (dialysis or renal transplant). CKD is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CV); this is the most frequent complication, including the principal cause of death for these patients. The two most prevalent causes of CKD are diabetes mellitus and arterial hypertension. CKD constitutes a problem in Public Health, not only because of its potential need for dialysis and transplant in the long run, but also for the cardiovascular co-morbidity implicated from its initial stages. Our Scientific and Professional National Societies have recommended, in a previous document published in 2010, that the evaluation of the renal function be estimated by means of the glomerular filtrate index (GFI) by a formula, taking into account the measure of plasmatic creatinine. For our societies, the recommended formula in adults is MDRD (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease). In this one, the only parameter that is measured is the determination of creatinine in blood; although recient opinions highlight the potential superiority of CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration), particularly when the renal function is slightly affected. Anyway, and despite which is the best formula to be used, the evaluation of the renal function is an image of the functional condition of the kidney at a specific time, and the accumulated evidences offer little or no possibility of knowing the evolution of the functional and clinical situation. The persistent presence of increased concentrations of protein or albumin in urine is a signal of renal injury and constitutes, together with GFI, the best strategy on which both the diagnosis and prediction of CKD rely on.
In order to determine the loss of proteins or albumin in urine, test strips in urine samples taken at ramdom or from first urine morning samples or from 24-hours urine samples were used depending on the clinical situation. It depends whether we are performing a population screening, a specialized diagnostic confirmation, the monitoring of a classic treatment or the evaluation of a new antiproteinuric strategy.
It should be highlighted that the use of test strips for the screening of total proteins in urine has already been evaluated by different means. These have compared the diagnostic precision of the test strip with the measure of protein in a 24-hour urine in populations with a high prevalence of proteinuria. However, the results show a variable sensitivity and specificity. That is why the majority of the clinical practice guides suggest the confirmation of a positive result by means of a quantitative measure. On the other hand, the semiquantitative measure of albumin by means of test strips based on immunological or non-immunological procedures is capable of detecting small concentrations of albumin (the mean of limit of detection is 20 mg/l). Moreover, the positive and negative predictive value is variable depending on the concentration used to define albuminuria.
Taking into account the concepts mentioned above, in those cases that are considered necessary to evaluate small amounts of protein loss in the urine, the determination of urinary albumin and of the ratio albumin/creatinine should be requested; preferably in the first morning urine.
Each clinical situation requires preferential handlings and methodologies, when we try to perform diagnostic confirmation or monitoring of the already existing kidney disease the use of the Albumin/Creatinin ratio or the Protein/Creatinin ratio in urine is recommended in the first morning urine in adults and little children, and in the 24-hour urine in children with adequate control of sphincters. It is recommended that the concentration of protein or albumin in urine be referred to the concentration of urinary creatinine to minimize the errors depending on the volume and on the hydration status of the patient.
The results will be expressed in mg/g, or else mg/mmol, depending on the types of units used by each laboratory. The results should be expressed without decimals (mg/g) or with one decimal (mg/mmol). If the samples are not processed the same day of their obtainment, should be stored at temperatures between 2 °C and 8 °C for 7 days. It is also advisable to quit the use of the terms microalbuminuria and macroalbuminuria, and replace them instead for albuminuria, as the urinary loss of albumin constitutes a continuous variable of renal and cardiovascular risk. This document provides a general and updated vision of the role of proteinuria in the diagnosis and monitoring of the CKD.

References

Coresh J, Selvin E, Stevens LA, Manzi J, Kusek JW, Eggers P, et al. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in the United States. JAMA. 2007;298(17):2038-47.

Inserra F, Cornelio C, Daverio S, Diehl S, Samarelli N, Díaz A. Frecuencias relativas de diabetes creatininas elevadas y proteinuria en análisis clínicos de Buenos Aires. Nefrol Argent. 2003;1:53.

Alles A, Fraga A, García R, Gómez A, Greloni G, Inserra F, et al. Detección de la enfermedad renal crónica. Documento multidisciplinario. Nefrol Argent. 2010;8(1):48-54.

Schwartz GJ, Muñoz A, Schneider MF, Mak RH, Kaskel F, Warady BA, et al. Furth SL. New equations to estimate GFR in children with CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20(3):629-37.

Hoyer JR, Seiler MW. Pathophysiology of Tamm-Horsfall protein. Kidney Int. 1979;16(3):279-89.

Kashif W, Siddiqi N, Dincer AP, Dincer HE, Hirsch S. Proteinuria: how to evaluate an important finding. Cleve Clin J Med. 2003;70(6):535-7, 541-4, 546-7.

Brandt JR, Jacobs A, Raissy HH, Kelly FM, Staples AO, Kaufman E, et al. Orthostatic proteinuria and the spectrum of diurnal variability of urinary protein excretion in healthy children. Pediatr Nephrol. 2010;25(6):1131-7.

Escalante-Gómez C, Zeledón-Sánchez F, Ulate-Montero G. Proteinuria, fisiología y fisiopatología aplicada. Acta Méd Costarric. 2007;49(2):83-9.

Hogg RJ, Portman RJ, Milliner D, Lemley KV, Eddy A, Ingelfinger J. Evaluation and management of proteinuria and nephrotic syndrome in children: recommendations from a pediatric nephrology panel established at the National Kidney Foundation conference on proteinuria, albuminuria, risk, assessment, detection, and elimination (PARADE). Pediatrics. 2000;105(6):1242-9.

Reino Unido. National Collaborating Centre for Chronic Conditions. Chronic Kidney Disease: National Clinical Guideline for Early Identification and Management in Adults in Primary and Secondary Care [Internet]. London: Royal College of Physicians (UK); 2008. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK51773/pdf/Bookshelf_NBK51773.pdf. [Consulta: 15 jun. 2010].

Caring for Australasians with Renal Impairment (CARI). Chronic Kidney Disease Guidelines: Urine Protein as Diagnostic Test [Internet]. Disponible en: http://www.cari.org.au/archived_guidelines.html. [Consulta: 15 jun. 2010].

Lane C, Brown M, Dunsmuir W, Kelly J, Mangos G. Can spot urine protein/creatinine ratio replace 24 h urine protein in usual clinical nephrology? Nephrology (Carlton). 2006;11(3):245-9.

Montañés Bermúdez R, Gracia García S, Pérez Surribas D, Martínez Castelao A, Bover Sanjuán J. Documento de Consenso. Recomendaciones sobre la valoración de la proteinuria en el diagnóstico y seguimiento de la enfermedad renal crónica. Nefrología (Madr.) 2011;31(3):331-45.

Halimi JM, Hadjadj S, Aboyans V, Allaert FA, Artigou JY, Beaufils M, et al. Microalbuminuria and urinary albumin excretion: French clinical practice guidelines. Diabetes Metab. 2007;33(4):303-9.

Singh A, Satchell SC. Microalbuminuria: causes and implications. Pediatr Nephrol. 2011;26(11):1957-65.

Miller WG, Bruns DE, Hortin GL, Sandberg S, Aakre KM, McQueen MJ, et al. Current issues in measurement and reporting of urinary albumin excretion. Clin Chem. 2009;55(1):24-38.

Atkins RC, Briganti EM, Zimmet PZ, Chadban SJ. Association between albuminuria and proteinuria in the general population: the AusDiab Study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2003;18(10):2170-4.

Newman DJ, Thakkar H, Medcalf EA, Gray MR, Price CP. Use of urine albumin measurement as a replacement for total protein. Clin Nephrol. 1995;43(2):104-9.

Gansevoort RT, de Jong PE. The case for using albuminuria in staging chronic kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20(3):465-8.

De Jong PE, Curhan GC. Screening, monitoring, and treatment of albuminuria: Public health perspectives. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17(8):2120-6.

Remuzzi G, Ruggenenti P, Benigni A. Understanding the nature of renal disease progression. Kidney Int. 1997;51(1):2-15.

Miettinen H, Haffner SM, Lehto S, Rönnemaa T, Pyörälä K, Laakso M. Proteinuria predicts stroke and other atherosclerotic vascular disease events in nondiabetic and non-insulin-dependent diabetic subjects. Stroke. 1996;27(11):2033-9.

Hallan SI, Ritz E, Lydersen S, Romundstad S, Kvenild K, Orth SR. Combining GFR and albuminuria to classify CKD improves prediction of ESRD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20(5):1069-77.

Chronic Kidney Disease Prognosis Consortium, Matsushita K, Van der Velde M, Astor BC, Woodward M, Levey AS, et al. Association of estimated glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in general population cohorts: a collaborative meta-analysis. Lancet. 2010;375(9731):2073-81.

Lea J, Greene T, Hebert L, Lipkowitz M, Massry S, Middleton J, et al. The relationship between magnitude of proteinuria reduction and risk of end-stage renal disease: results of the African American study of kidney disease and hypertension. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(8):947-53.

Levey AS, De Jong PE, Coresh J, El Nahas M, Astor BC, et al. The definition, classification, and prognosis of chronic kidney disease: a KDIGO Controversies Conference report. Kidney Int. 2011;80(1):17-28.

KDIGO 2012 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease. Chapter 2: Definition, identification, and prediction of CKD progression. Kidney Int Suppl. 2013;3(1):63-72.

Glassock RJ. Debate: CON position. Should microalbuminuria ever be considered as a renal endpoint in any clinical trial? Am J Nephrol. 2010;31(5):462-5; discussion 466-7.

Lambers Heerspink HJ, de Zeeuw D. Debate: PRO position. Should microalbuminuria ever be considered as a renal endpoint in any clinical trial? Am J Nephrol. 2010;31(5):458-61; discussion 468.

Bakris GL, Sarafidis PA, Weir MR, Dahlöf B, Pitt B, Jamerson K, et al. Renal outcomes with different fixed-dose combination therapies in patients with hypertension at high risk for cardiovascular events (ACCOMPLISH): a prespecified secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;375(9721):1173-81.

Heathcote KL, Wilson MP, Quest DW, Wilson TW. Prevalence and duration of exercise induced albuminuria in healthy people. Clin Invest Med. 2009;32(4):E261-5.

Ginsberg JM, Chang BS, Matarese RA, Garella S. Use of single voided urine samples to estimate quantitative proteinuria. N Engl J Med. 1983;309(25):1543-6.

Christopher-Stine L, Petri M, Astor BC, Fine D. Urine protein-to-creatinine ratio is a reliable measure of proteinuria in lupus nephritis. J Rheumatol. 2004;31(8):1557-9.

Xin G, Wang M, Jiao LL, Xu GB, Wang HY. Protein-to-creatinine ratio in spot urine samples as a predictor of quantitation of proteinuria. Clin Chim Acta. 2004;350(1-2):35-9.

Price CP, Newall RG, Boyd JC. Use of protein:creatinine ratio measurements on random urine samples for prediction of significant proteinuria: a systematic review. Clin Chem. 2005;51(9):1577-86.

Rodby RA, Rohde RD, Sharon Z, Pohl MA, Bain RP, Lewis EJ. The urine protein to creatinine ratio as a predictor of 24-hour urine protein excretion in type 1 diabetic patients with nephropathy. The Collaborative Study Group. Am J Kidney Dis. 1995;26(6):904-9.

Marshall SM. Screening for microalbuminuria: which measurement? Diabet Med. 1991;8(8):706-11.

Witte EC, Lambers Heerspink HJ, De Zeeuw D, Bakker SJL, De Jong PE, et al. First morning voids are more reliable than spot urine samples to

assess microalbuminuria. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20(2):436-43.

Lambers Heerspink HJ, Brantsma AH, de Zeeuw D, Bakker SJ, De Jong PE, Gansevoort RT; PREVEND Study Group. Albuminuria assessed from first-morning-void urine samples versus 24-hour urine collections as a predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;168(8):897-905.

Gansevoort RT, Brinkman J, Bakker SJ, De Jong PE, de Zeeuw D. Evaluation of measures of urinary albumin excretion. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;164(8):725-7.

Henry JB. El Laboratorio en el diagnóstico clínico. Madrid: Marbán, 2005. 1376 p.

Brinkman JW, De Zeeuw D, Duker JJ, Gansevoort RT, Kema IP, Hillege HL, et al. Falsely low urinary albumin concentrations after prolonged frozen storage of urine samples. Clin Chem. 2005;51(11):2181-3.

Brinkman JW, Heerspink HL, De Zeeuw D, Gansevoort RT, Bakker SJ. Urinary pH affects albumin concentrations after prolonged frozen storage. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007;22(12):3670.

Brinkman JW, de Zeeuw D, Gansevoort RT, Duker JJ, Kema IP, de Jong PE, et al. Prolonged frozen storage of urine reduces the value of albuminuria for mortality prediction. Clin Chem. 2007;53(1):153-4.

Brinkman JW, De Zeeuw D, Lambers Heerspink HJ, Gansevoort RT, Kema IP, De Jong PE, et al. Apparent loss of urinary albumin during long-term frozen storage: HPLC vs immunonephelometry. Clin Chem. 2007;53(8):1520-6.

Ralston SH, Caine N, Richards I, O'Reilly D, Sturrock RD, Capell HA. Screening for proteinuria in a rheumatology clinic: comparison of dipstick testing, 24 hour urine quantitative protein, and protein/creatinine ratio in random urine samples. Ann Rheum Dis. 1988;47(9):759-63.

Waugh JJ, Clark TJ, Divakaran TG, Khan KS, Kilby MD. Accuracy of urinalysis dipstick techniques in predicting significant proteinuria in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103(4):769-77.

James GP, Bee DE, Fuller JB. Proteinuria: accuracy and precision of laboratory diagnosis by dip-stick analysis. Clin Chem. 1978;24(11):1934-9.

Lloyd A, Jewell T. Designed to Tackle Renal Disease in Wales: A National Service Framework [Internet]. Renal NSF Project Board, 2007, 192 p. Disponible en: http://www.wales.nhs.uk/ [Consulta: 15 jun. 2013].

Martin H. Laboratory Measurement of Urine Albumin and Urine Total Protein in Screening for Proteinuria in Chronic Kidney Disease. Clin Biochem Rev. 2011;32:97-102.

McElderry LA, Tarbit IF, Cassells-Smith AJ. Six methods for urinary protein compared. Clin Chem. 1982;28(2):356-60.

Nishi HH, Elin RJ. Three turbidimetric methods for determining total protein compared. Clin Chem. 1985;31(8):1377-80.

Ramón F, Alsina M, Alvarez V, Biosca C, Bullich S, Cava F, et al. XIX Programa de Garantía Externa de la Calidad de Bioquímica (orina) de la Sociedad Española de Bioquímica Clínica y Patología Molecular (2009) [Internet]. Disponible en: http://www.contcal.org/k3/docs/2009/ANUAL/orina.pdf [Consulta: 21 nov. 2010].

Encuesta a los Bioquímicos. Evaluación de la función renal, uso de fórmulas y determinaciones analíticas involucradas [Internet]. Buenos Aires: Sociedad Argentina de Nefrología, Confederación Unificada Bioquímica, Asociación Bioquímica Argentina, Fundación Bioquímica Argentina, 2012. [16 p.]. Disponible en: http://www.fba.org.ar/panel-gestion/InformeResultado/InformefinalencuestaFR.pdf [Consulta: 15 jun. 2013].

Liu R, Li G, Cui XF, Zhang DL, Yang QH, Mu XY, et al. Methodological evaluation and comparison of five urinary albumin measurements. J Clin Lab Anal. 2011;25(5):324-9.

Seegmiller JC, Sviridov D, Larson TS, Borland TM, Hortin GL, Lieske JC. Comparison of urinary albumin quantification by immunoturbidimetry, competitive immunoassay, and protein-cleavage liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Clin Chem. 2009;55(11):1991-4.

Aakre KM, Thue G, Subramaniam-Haavik S, Bukve T, Morris H, Müller M, et al. Postanalytical external quality assessment of urine albumin in primary health care: an international survey. Clin Chem. 2008;54(10):1630-6.

Osicka TM, Comper WD. Characterization of immunochemically nonreactive urinary albumin. Clin Chem. 2004;50(12):2286-91.

Singh R, Crow FW, Babic N, Lutz WH, Lieske JC, Larson TS, et al. A liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method for the quantification of urinary albumin using a novel 15N-isotopically labeled albumin internal standard. Clin Chem. 2007;53(3):540-2.

Itoh Y, Ichihara K, Kishi K, Hosogaya S, Yamada T. Preparation of highly purified monomeric human serum albumin as secondary reference material for standardization of urinary albumin immunoassays. Clin Chim Acta. 2012;413(1-2):175-81.

Zoccali C, Mallamaci F. Albuminuria in the normal range: the lower is not the better. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(15):1634-6.

Published
2017-07-28
How to Cite
1.
Inserra F, Angerosa M, Alegre JR, Alles A, Bianchi ME, Dorado E, Etchegoyen MC, Fayad A, Greloni G, Mazziotta D, Pennacchiotti G, Rosa Diez G, Torales S, Torres ML, Varela F, Villagra A. Consensus Document. Implication of proteinuria in the diagnosis and monitoring of the chronic kidney disease (CKD). Rev Nefrol Dial Traspl. [Internet]. 2017Jul.28 [cited 2024Jul.16];33(4):233-48. Available from: http://revistarenal.org.ar/index.php/rndt/article/view/154
Section
Special Article