Fiabilidad y validez de la versión turca de la escala de autocuidado para receptores de trasplante renal

  • Çiğdem Erdem Faculty of Health Science, Süleyman Demirel Universitesi, Çünür/Isparta, Turkey
  • Fatma Cebeci Faculty of Nursing, Head of the Surgical Nursing Department, Akdeniz Universitesi, Hemşirelik Fakültesi, Antalya, Turkey
Palabras clave: trasplante renal, autocuidado, fiabilidad y validez de la escala

Resumen

Introducción: El Self-management se define como la participación activa de los individuos en su tratamiento. La participación de los receptores de trasplante renal en su tratamiento es importante para el éxito de la intervención y la salud general del paciente. Objetivo: El objetivo del estudio es establecer la fiabilidad y validez de la Self-Management Scale para receptores de trasplante renal en Turquía. Material y métodos: Se recogen datos a partir del Patient Introduction Form y la Self-Management Scale para receptores de trasplante renal. Se realizan cálculos como porcentajes, media, desviación típica, content validity index, análisis factorial, test-retest, análisis correlacional y alfa de Cronbach. Resultados: Se utiliza el método de corrección de la escala recomendado por la Organización Mundial de la Salud. El valor del item content validity index es 0,99, El valor del scale content validity index es 0,93 y ambos resultan 1,00. Se realiza un análisis factorial que resulta en 3 factores de cargas que oscilan entre 0,42 y 0,79. El coeficiente de fiabilidad es de 0,73. La fiabilidad obtenida a partir de test-retest es significativa (p=<0.05). Conclusiones: La Self-Management Scale para receptores de trasplante renal en Turquía es válida, fiable y una herramienta complementaria. Los profesionales de la salud pueden hacer uso de ella para evaluar las habilidades de autogestión de los receptores de trasplante renal.

Citas

1) Turquía. Ministry of Health. Organ transplant waiting list and transplantations statistics in the Turkey 2018 [Internet]. Disponible en: https://organkds.saglik.gov.tr/ (consulta: 18/02/2021).

2) Urstad KH. Patient Education for Renal Transplant Recipients [Tesis doctoral]. Oslo: Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, 2013. Disponible en: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/30829991.pdf (consulta: 18/02/2021).

3) Ding D. Post-kidney transplant rejection and infection complications. Nephrol Nurs J. 2010;37(4):419-26.

4) Berben L, Denhaerynck K, Dobbels F, Engberg S, Vanhaecke J, Crespo-Leiro MG, et al.; BRIGHT study consortium. Building research initiative group: chronic illness management and adherence in transplantation (BRIGHT) study: study protocol. J Adv Nurs. 2015;71(3):642-54. doi: 10.1111/jan.12519.

5) Lin SY, Fetzer SJ, Lee PC, Chen CH. Predicting adherence to health care recommendations using health promotion behaviours in kidney transplant recipients within 1-5 years post-transplant. J Clin Nurs. 2011;20(23-24):3313-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03757.x.

6) Bodenheimer T, Lorig K, Holman H, Grumbach K. Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. JAMA. 2002;288(19):2469-75. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.19.2469.

7) Lorig KR, Holman H. Self-management education: history, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms. Ann Behav Med. 2003;26(1):1-7. doi: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2601_01.

8) Grady PA, Gough LL. Self-management: a comprehensive approach to management of chronic conditions. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(8):e25-31. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302041.

9) Moore SM, Schiffman R, Waldrop-Valverde D, Redeker NS, McCloskey DJ, Kim MT, et al. Recommendations of common data elements to advance the science of self-management of chronic conditions. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2016;48(5):437-47. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12233.

10) Haspeslagh A, De Bondt K, Kuypers D, Naesens M, Breunig C, Dobbels F. Completeness and satisfaction with the education and information received by patients immediately after kidney transplant: a mixed-models study. Prog Transplant. 2013;23(1):12-22. doi: 10.7182/pit2013249.

11) Schmid-Mohler G, Schäfer-Keller P, Frei A, Fehr T, Spirig R. A mixed-method study to explore patients' perspective of self-management tasks in the early phase after kidney transplant. Prog Transplant. 2014;24(1):8-18. doi: 10.7182/pit2014728.

12) Kobus G, Małyszko J, Małyszko JS, Puza E, Bachórzewska-Gajewska H, Myśliwiec M. Compliance with lifestyle recommendations in kidney allograft recipients. Transplant Proc. 2011;43(8):2930-4. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.08.031.

13) Kosaka S, Tanaka M, Sakai T, Tomikawa S, Yoshida K, Chikaraishi T, et al. Development of self-management scale for kidney transplant recipients, including management of post-transplantation chronic kidney disease. ISRN Transplantation. 2013;2013:1-7. doi: 10.5402/2013/619754.

14) Khezerloo S, Mahmoudi H, Vafadar Z. Evaluating the psychometric properties of the persian self-management scale for kidney transplant recipients. Urol J. 2019;16(2):186-192. doi: 10.22037/uj.v0i0.4339.

15) Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2006;29(5):489-97. doi: 10.1002/nur.20147.

16) Atkinson TM, Rosenfeld BD, Sit L, Mendoza TR, Fruscione M, Lavene D, et al. Using confirmatory factor analysis to evaluate construct validity of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011;41(3):558-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.05.008.

17) Çapik C. Use of confirmatory factor analysis in validity and reliability studies. Anadolu Hemsirelik Saglik Bilimleri Derg. 2014;17(3):196--205.

18) Büyüköztürk Ş. Data Analysis Guidebook for Social Sciences: Statistics, Research Design, SPSS-Applications and Interpretation. 18th ed. Ankara: Pegem Akademi, 2013.

19) Çokluk Ö, Şekercioğlu G, Büyüköztürk Ş. Multivariate Statistic for Social Sciences: SPSS and LISREL Applications. 2th ed. Ankara: Pegem Akademi, 2012.

20) Pourmand G, Dehghani S, Rahmati MR, Mehrsai A, Gooran S, Alizadeh F, et al. Does hypertension remain after kidney transplantation? Acta Med Iran. 2015;53(5):297-300.

21) Saint-Remy A, Somja M, Gellner K, Weekers L, Bonvoisin C, Krzesinski JM. Urinary and dietary sodium, and potassium associated with blood pressure control in treated hypertensive kidney transplant recipients: an observational study. BMC Nephrol. 2012;13:121. doi: 10.1186/1471-2369-13-121.

22) Soypacaci Z, Sengul S, Yıldız EA, Keven K, Kutlay S, Erturk S, et al. Effect of daily sodium intake on post-transplant hypertension in kidney allograft recipients. Transplant Proc. 2013;45(3):940-3. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.02.050.

23) Brown IJ, Tzoulaki I, Candeias V, Elliott P. Salt intakes around the world: implications for public health. Int J Epidemiol. 2009;38(3):791-813. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyp139.

24) Veater NL, East L. Exploring depression amongst kidney transplant recipients: a literature review. J Ren Care. 2016;42(3):172-84. doi: 10.1111/jorc.12162.
Publicado
2022-06-14
Cómo citar
1.
Erdem Çiğdem, Cebeci F. Fiabilidad y validez de la versión turca de la escala de autocuidado para receptores de trasplante renal. Rev Nefrol Dial Traspl. [Internet]. 14 de junio de 2022 [citado 28 de marzo de 2024];42(2):117-23. Disponible en: http://revistarenal.org.ar/index.php/rndt/article/view/789
Sección
Artículo Original