Rev. Nefro. Dial y Traspl. 2023;43(3):138-147
Effects of Carbon Dioxide Pneumoperitoneum
on Renal Functions in Obstructive Jaundice: An Experimental Study in a Rat
Model
Efectos del
neumoperitoneo por dióxido de carbono sobre las funciones renales en la
ictericia obstructiva: un estudio experimental en un modelo de rata
Merter Gulen1, Mustafa Sare2, Ramazan Kozan2 ORCID: 0000-0002-3835-8759
1) Department of General Surgery, Atılım University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
2) Department of General Surgery, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
3) Department of Ophthalmology, UT Southwestern
Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
4) Department
of Nephrology, Dokuz Eylül University, Faculty of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey
5) Department of Biochemistry, Ankara Training and
Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
6) Department of Biochemistry, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
Cómo citar este artículo (How to cite this article) M. Gulen, M. Sare, R. Kozan, S. Yuksel, S. Müge-Deger, M. Senes, A. Banu-Cayci. Effects of Carbon Dioxide Pneumoperitoneum
on Renal Functions in Obstructive Jaundice: An Experimental Study in a Rat
Model
Recibido: 18-05-2021
Corregido: 15-06-2022
Aceptado: 21-06-2023
RESUMEN
Introducción: Se sabe que tanto el neumoperitoneo (PNP) como la ictericia obstructiva (IO) conducen potencialmente a una lesión renal aguda (IRA), pero no se ha investigado el efecto combinado. Objetivo: Este estudio tuvo como objetivo investigar los efectos del PNP en las funciones renales en un modelo de rata de IO. Método: Cuarenta y ocho ratas se dividieron en ocho grupos de seis ratas. El grupo 1 fue el grupo de control (operado de forma simulada); A los grupos 2, 3 y 4 se les indujo 5, 10 y 15 mmHg de CO2 PNP respectivamente (Grupos 1-4: “Grupos no OJ”); el grupo 5 fue el grupo IO; y los Grupos 6, 7 y 8 eran grupos IO que fueron inducidos con 5, 10 y 15 mmHg de CO2 PNP respectivamente (Grupos 5-8: “Grupos OJ”). Se ligó el conducto biliar común y se dividió en grupos IO. A las 48 horas se indujo una PNP de 5-10-15 mmHg mediante minilaparotomía con aguja de Veress en los Grupos 6, 7 y 8, mantenida durante 60 minutos. Resultados: No hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre los grupos en cuanto a los niveles de Nitrógeno ureico en sangre y Creatinina (p> 0,05). Los valores de lipocalina asociada a gelatinasa de neutrófilos (NGAL) fueron significativamente más altos en los grupos IO que en los grupos no IO (p < 0,05). Los valores séricos de cistatina-C fueron significativamente más altos en los grupos IO con PNP de 10 y 15 mmHg que en los grupos sin IO (p < 0,05). Conclusión: en la etapa temprana de AKI, los niveles de NGAL y Cystatin-C pueden ser más altos, mientras que las pruebas estándar de función renal fueron normales. Nuestros hallazgos destacan el aparente efecto desfavorable de IO con PNP sobre las funciones renales y el reconocimiento temprano de AKI con la medición de NGAL y Cystatin-C en estas condiciones.
PALABRAS CLAVE: Insuficiencia Renal Aguda (IRA);
Cistatina-C; laparoscopia; lipocalina asociada a gelatinasa de neutrófilos
(NGAL); ictericia obstructiva (OJ); neumoperitoneo (PNP)
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Both
pneumoperitoneum (PNP) and obstructive jaundice (OJ) are known to potentially
lead to acute kidney injury (AKI), but the combined effect has not been
investigated. Aim: This study aimed to investigate the effects of PNP on
renal functions in a rat model of OJ. Method: Forty-eight rats were
divided into eight groups of six rats. Group 1 was the control (sham-operated)
group; Groups 2, 3 and 4 were induced 5, 10 and 15 mmHg of CO2 PNP respectively
(Groups 1-4: “non-OJ Groups”); Group 5 was the OJ group; and Groups 6, 7 and 8
were OJ groups that were induced with 5, 10 and 15 mmHg CO2 PNP was respectively
(Groups 5-8: “OJ Groups”). Common bile duct was ligated and divided to OJ
Groups. After 48 hours, a 5-10-15 mmHg PNP was induced by minilaparotomy with a Veress needle in Groups 6, 7 and 8, maintained for 60 minutes. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between groups in terms of
blood urea Nitrogen and Creatinin levels (p>
0.05). Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) values were
significantly higher in OJ Groups than non-OJ Groups (p< 0.05). Serum
Cystatin-C values were significantly higher in OJ Groups with 10 and 15 mmHg
PNP than non-OJ Groups (p< 0.05). Conclusion: In the early stage of
AKI, NGAL and Cystatin-C levels might be higher while standard renal function
tests were normal. Our findings highlight the apparent unfavourable effect of OJ with PNP on renal functions and early recognition of AKI with the
measurement of NGAL and Cystatin-C in these conditions.
KEYWORDS: Acute
kidney injury (AKI); Cystatin-C; laparoscopy; neutrophil gelatinase associated lipocalin
(NGAL); obstructive jaundice (OJ); pneumoperitoneum (PNP)
INTRODUCTION
Laparoscopic approach has been the first choice
of techniques in many areas of surgery. The understanding of the increment of
intra-abdominal pressure during carbon dioxide (CO2) pneumoperitoneum (PNP) as
a part of laparoscopic surgery is important as
systemic changes due to CO2 have become important. Despite advantages,
laparoscopic surgical procedures and CO2 PNP have effects on many systems and
organs such as brain, lungs and liver (1,2). Kidney is one of the
important organs where such effects may be observed (3-5).
When physiological changes associated with PNP
are considered, it has been reported that the decrease in blood flow might
cause ischemic changes in intra-abdominal organs (6). Experimental
studies have demonstrated significant and reversible decreases in the
glomerular filtration rate (GFR), urinary outflow and renal blood flow (3,5-7).Those effects may depend on the pressure applied during PNP, with other
several mechanisms such as decrement of cardiac output, renal vein and
parenchyma imprinting, and hormonal effects (4,6,8-12).
Another condition having an effect on renal
functions is obstructive jaundice (OJ) (13). The obstruction of the
biliary tree and obstruction of bile flow cause the accumulation of many
substances with a systemic toxic effect, primarily bile salt and bilirubin (14).
Acute tubular necrosis (ATN) is one of the complications encountered in OJ with
the presence rate of 8% (15). Hence, deterioration in renal function
may be due to both OJ along with PNP (16).
Although there are various human and animal
studies in the literature on the effects of PNP and OJ on renal functions, to
the best of our knowledge, no study has documented the relation between acute
kidney injury (AKI) and PNP along with OJ, especially analysing with NGAL and Cystatin-C assessment (3-6,14-16).
Cystatin-C is a basic protein with a low
molecular weight (13 kDa) and is a non-glycolysis
polypeptide cysteine proteinase inhibitor (17,18). It is synthesized
at a steady rate in all nuclear cells in the body. Cystatin-C is present in all
tissues and biological fluids at measurable amounts. Although, the primary
structure, physical, chemical, and immunological characteristics of Cystatin-C
have been determined; its biological role is still not
well defined (17). During the structural analysis of the Cystatin-C
gene, it has been demonstrated that there is a steady production rate, even in
inflammatory conditions which is not affected by any
condition (18). Due to its small molecular weight and basic
iso-electric pH, it drains more freely in glomerulus compared to other
proteins. Almost all are reabsorbed by proximal tubules and catabolized in
tubular cells resulting no return to the blood flow (19). Hence, it
seems like Cystatin-C has some advantages compared to serum Creatinine in
measuring renal functions (4,20,21). Serum Creatinine levels depend
on the muscle mass, age, gender, muscle metabolism and hydration condition.
Acute changes in glomerular filtration function, serum Creatinine values do not
exactly reflect the kidney functions until the stable condition balance is
ensured. A meta-analysis of 46 studies showed that Cystatin-C was superior to
serum Creatinine for the determination of AKI (21).
Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin
(NGAL), also known as lipocalin-2 or siderocalin is a
protein, which creates a covalent bond with neutrophil gelatinase, weighs 25 kDa and consists of 178 amino acids (22,23).
Various biological functions of NGAL have been identified such as triggering of
apoptosis, suppression of bacterial reproduction, regulation of inflammatory
response (22). Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin is
expressed in bone marrow, colon, kidneys, lungs, stomach, uterus, prostate, trachea (22,23). Basically, the increase in NGAL
expression occurs together with inflammatory and epithelial damage (23,24).
It has been documented that NGAL levels increase in both blood and urine
analyses after toxic or ischemic damage to kidney (4,23,25-26).
Based on laparoscopic surgery practices for
either benign (choledocholitiasis, benign biliary
strictures) or malign (pancreas carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, ampulla tumour, choledochal lower end tumour)
conditions that might cause OJ, we aimed in this study to determine the effects
of PNP applied at different pressures to rats along with the OJ model on renal
functions by using new identifiers, NGAL and Cystatin-C.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A total of 48 male Wistar albino rats weighing
between 350-400 grams and having an average age of six months were used in the
study. The rats were divided into eight groups of six rats each. Throughout the
experiment, the lighting arrangement was in the form of 12 hours of day and 12
hours of night. The rats were placed in cages in groups of six. Room
temperature was maintained at 21±2.5 °C. The rats were fed with standard
pellets throughout the study and given tap water. Surgical anaesthesia was applied through intramuscular injection of Xylazine hydrochloride (Rompun, Bayer HealthCare) 5 mg/kg
dose in addition to 50 mg/kg of ketamine hydrochloride (Ketalar,
Parke Davis and Eczacibasi, Istanbul).
Surgical Procedure and Operative Details
After required sterile conditions were ensured
following anaesthesia, the front abdominal walls of
the rats were shaved and cleaned with 10% povidone-iodine solution. Through a
5-millimeter incision to the abdominal wall, a Veress needle (Ethicon
Endo-Surgery, UV120, USA) was fixed to the abdominal cavity with 3/0 silk
suture. After the Veress was fixed, an electronic insufflator (Karl Storz GmbH, Tutlingen, Germany) was connected and 5 mmHg, 10 mmHg
and 15 mmHg of CO2 constant pressure was insufflated. The insufflator was
adjusted so that in case there was absorption of CO2 gas on the peritoneal
surface or a leakage, it would automatically insufflate gas in order to ensure
that intra-abdominal pressure would be maintained at the desired level.
Minilaparotomy was performed to the rats in Group 1, and after placing a Veress needle into
the abdomen without applying PNP and waiting for 60 minutes, intracardiac blood
samples were taken and the rats were sacrificed. After 60 minutes of CO2 PNP
was applied at pressures of 5, 10, and 15 mmHg respectively as mentioned above
to the rats in Groups 2, 3, and 4, intracardiac blood samples were taken and
they were sacrificed. After laparotomy was performed to the rats in Group 5, the
main bile duct extending to the duodenum from the liver hilum was found and
dissected from the surrounding adipose tissues. It was cut after being ligated
from its proximal and distal with 4/0 silk sutures. Then, 1 mL normal saline
was physiologically injected into the abdomen and the folds were closed as
primary and the procedure was finalized. Following the operation, the rats were
fed for 48 hours with standard rat feed and for fluid resuscitation purposes
tap water was provided. At the end of this period (48 hours), after placing a
Veress needle into the abdomen without applying PNP and waiting for 60 minutes,
intracardiac blood samples were taken and the rats were sacrificed. For the
rats in Groups 6, 7, and 8, OJ was created in the same manner mentioned above. After the operation, fluid resuscitation was applied to the rats in the same
manner and they were fed with standard rat feed. In the postoperative 48th
hour, after placing a Veress needle in sterile conditions with minilaparotomy on rats in Groups 6, 7, and 8 and after PNP
at pressures of 5, 10, and 15 mmHg were applied for 60 minutes with an
electronic insufflator (Karl-Storz GmbH, Tutlingen,
Germany) controlling the intra-abdominal pressure, intracardiac blood samples
were taken and the rats were sacrificed. Therefore, experimental animals were
divided as follows: Group 1, Sham rats; Group 2, PNP 5 mmHg; Group 3, PNP 10
mmHg; Group 4, PNP 15 mmHg, Group 5, OJ; Group 6, PNP 5mmHg + OJ; Group 7, PNP
10 mmHg + OJ and Group 8, PNP 15 mmHg + OJ.
Blood Samples
The analyses consisted of Cystatin-C, NGAL, BUN
(blood urine Nitrogen), Creatinine, AST (Aspartate aminotransferase), ALT
(Alanine aminotransferase), GGT (Gamma-glutamyltransferase), ALP (Alkaline phosphatase), total and direct bilirubin levels.
Blood samples taken in tubes with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) were
centrifuged for 10 minutes at 3000 revolutions and serum samples were prepared.
Cystatin-C levels were expressed in mg/dL, NGAL levels in as ng/mL; BUN,
Creatinine, AST, ALT, GGT, ALP, total and direct bilirubin levels were
expressed in mg/dL.
Statistical Analysis
The data were analysed using SPSS 20.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The normality of the
variables were assessed with Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test.
All data were compared with the non-parametric test due to the abnormal
distribution. Groups without OJ (Groups 1, 2, 3, 4: “non-OJ Groups”) and groups
with OJ (Groups 5, 6, 7, 8: “OJ Groups”) were compared separately with the
Kruskal-Wallis Variance Analysis. For the purpose of determining the source of
differences in groups where there were significant differences, paired
comparisons were conducted with the Mann-Whitney U Test, comparing the pressure
in between OJ Groups and non-OJ Groups. Means were provided as mean ± standard
deviation or median interquartile range where needed. The significance level
for all analyses was taken considered as 0.05.
Ethics Committee Approval
This experimental study was conducted at the Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Experiment Animal
Research Laboratory with the consent nº B.30.2.GUN.0.05.06/78-6487 of the Gazi University Local Ethics Board on Animal Experiments.
RESULTS
No animal loss occurred in any group in the
study and all the animals tolerated the surgical procedure. Non-OJ Groups
(Groups 1, 2, 3 and 4) were compared in terms of serum AST, ALT, ALP, GGT,
total and direct bilirubin levels, and no significant difference was found between the groups (p= 0.57, p= 0.1, p=0.1, p=
0.1, p= 0.2 and p= 0.25, respectively). OJ Groups (Groups 5, 6, 7 and 8) were
compared in terms of serum AST, ALT, ALP, GGT, total and direct bilirubin
levels, and no significant difference was found (p= 0.38, p= 0.7, p=0.42, p=
0.79, p= 0.22 and p= 0.41, respectively) (Table 1).
Table 1. Comparisons of
hepatic enzyme levels, BUN and Creatinine levels in non-OJ Groups and OJ Groups
Parameters (median, min-max)
|
Group 1
|
Group 2
(PNP 5 mmHg)
|
Group 3
(PNP 10 mmHg)
|
Group 4
(PNP 15 mmHg)
|
p
|
AST (U/L)
|
195 (104-311)
|
209 (134-400)
|
165 (115-204)
|
173 (121-250)
|
0.57
|
ALT (U/L)
|
100 (89-119)
|
77 (57-94)
|
75 (48-89)
|
82 (69-96)
|
0.10
|
GGT(U/L)
|
1 (1-1)
|
1 (1-1)
|
1 (0-1)
|
1 (1-2)
|
0.10
|
T. Bil. (mg/dL)
|
0.14 (0.09-0.17)
|
0.13 (0.08-0.17)
|
0.15 (0.10-0.19)
|
0.17 (0.17-0.41)
|
0.20
|
D. Bil. (mg/dL)
|
0.02 (0.01-0.03)
|
0.03 (0.02-0.04)
|
0.03 (0.01-0.05)
|
0.02 (0.01-0.06)
|
0.25
|
ALP (U/L)
BUN (mg/dL)
Creatinine (mg/dL)
|
249 (228-418)
|
245 (192-395)
|
227 (187-258)
|
210 (155-228)
|
0.10
0.09
0.39
|
|
Group 5
(OJ)
|
Group 6
(PNP 5 mmHg+OJ)
|
Group 7
(PNP 10 mmHg+OJ)
|
Group 8
(PNP 15 mmHg+OJ)
|
p
|
AST (U/L)
|
1046 (903-1269)
|
772 (459-1260)
|
869 (246-1146)
|
813 (628-1232)
|
0.38
|
ALT (U/L)
|
887 (854-991)
|
934 (842-1063)
|
848 (556-991)
|
1014 (952-1032)
|
0.07
|
GGT(U/L)
|
18 (15-24)
|
19 (12-45)
|
24 (11-43)
|
21 (12-48)
|
0.79
|
T. Bil. (mg/dL)
|
10.11 (8.20-10.71)
|
8.63 (7.29-9.93)
|
10.04 (2.09-17.35)
|
9.29 (6.06-11.25)
|
0.22
|
D. Bil. (mg/dL)
|
6.0 (5.19-6.23)
|
5.11 (4.65-5.93)
|
5.78 (1.21-8.79)
|
5.50 (3.75-7.09)
|
0.41
|
ALP (U/L)
BUN (mg/dL)
Creatinine (mg/dL)
|
963 (817-1279)
|
955 (792-1807)
|
1047 (729-1473)
|
933 (705-1217)
|
0.42
|
PNP= pneumoperitoneum, OJ= obstructive jaundice
Non-OJ Groups (Groups 1, 2, 3 and 4) were
compared in terms of serum BUN and Creatinine levels, and no significant
difference was found between the groups (p= 0.09 and p= 0.39, respectively). OJ
Groups (Groups 5, 6, 7 and 8) were compared in terms of serum BUN and
Creatinine levels, and no significant difference was found between the groups
(p= 0.11 and p= 0.12, respectively) (Table 1).
Hepatic enzyme (total bilirubin, direct bilirubin,
AST, ALT, GGT and ALP) levels were higher in OJ Group 5 compared to non-OJ
Group 1 (control) (p= 0.002, for all parameters). There was no significant
difference between BUN and Creatinine levels between these two groups (p= 0.08
and p= 0.18, respectively). Hepatic enzyme levels were higher in OJ Group 6,
which was administered PNP at 5 mmHg pressure,
compared to non-OJ Group 2, which was administered PNP at 5 mmHg pressure (p=
0.002, for all parameters). The difference between BUN and Creatinine levels
was not significant (p= 0.24 and p= 0.485, respectively). Hepatic enzyme levels
were higher in OJ Group 7, which was administered PNP at 10
mmHg pressure, compared to non-OJ Group 3, which was administered PNP at
10 mmHg pressure (p= 0.002, for all parameters). The difference between BUN and
Creatinine levels was not significant (p= 0.423 and p= 0.061, respectively).
Similarly, hepatic enzyme levels were higher in OJ Group 8, which was
administered PNP at 15 mmHg pressure, compared to
non-OJ Group 4, which was administered PNP at 15 mmHg pressure (p= 0.002, for
all parameters). The difference between urea and Creatinine levels was not
significant (p= 0.394 and p= 0.24, respectively) (Table 2).
Table 2.
Comparison
of hepatic enzyme levels, BUN and Creatinine levels between pneumoperitoneum
groups with and without obstructive jaundice
Parameters (median, min-max)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AST (U/L)
|
195 (104-311)
|
1046 (903-1269)
|
0.002
|
209 (134-400)
|
772 (459-1260)
|
0.002
|
ALT (U/L)
|
100 (89-119)
|
887 (854-991)
|
0.002
|
77 (57-94)
|
934 (842-1063)
|
0.002
|
GGT (U/L)
|
1 (1-1)
|
18 (15-24)
|
0.002
|
1 (1-1)
|
19 (12-45)
|
0.002
|
T. Bil. (mg/dL)
|
0.14 (0.09-0.17)
|
10.11 (8.20-10.71)
|
0.002
|
0.13 (0.08-0.17)
|
8.63 (7.29-9.93)
|
0.002
|
D. Bil. (mg/dL)
|
0.02 (0.01-0.03)
|
6.0 (5.19-6.23)
|
0.002
|
0.03 (0.02-0.04)
|
5.11 (4.65-5.93)
|
0.002
|
ALP (U/L)
BUN (mg/dL)
Creatinine (mg/dL)
|
249 (228-418)
|
963 (817-1279)
|
0.002
|
245 (192-395)
|
955 (792-1807)
|
0.002
|
|
Group 3
|
Group 7
|
p
|
Group 4
|
Group 8
|
p
|
AST (U/L)
|
165 (115-204)
|
869 (246-1146)
|
0.002
|
173 (121-250)
|
813 (628-1232)
|
0.002
|
ALT (U/L)
|
75 (48-89)
|
848 (556-991)
|
0.002
|
82 (69-96)
|
1014 (952-1032)
|
0.002
|
GGT (U/L)
|
1 (0-1)
|
24 (11-43)
|
0.002
|
1 (1-2)
|
21 (12-48)
|
0.002
|
T. Bil. (mg/dL)
|
0.15 (0.10-0.19)
|
10.04 (2.09-17.35)
|
0.002
|
0.17 (0.17-0.41)
|
9.29 (6.06-11.25)
|
0.002
|
D. Bil. (mg/dL)
|
0.03 (0.01-0.05)
|
5.78 (1.21-8.79)
|
0.002
|
0.02 (0.01-0.06)
|
5.50 (3.75-7.09)
|
0.002
|
ALP (U/L)
BUN (mg/dL)
|
227 (187-258)
|
1047 (729-1473)
|
0.002
|
210 (155-228)
|
933 (705-1217)
|
0.002
|
Group 1: Control, Groups 2, 3, 4: Pneumoperitoneum
without obstructive jaundice Group 5: Obstructive jaundice, Groups 6, 7, 8: Pneumoperitoneum with obstructive jaundice
Non-OJ Groups (Groups 1,
2, 3 and 4) were compared in terms of serum NGAL and Cystatin-C levels, and no
significant difference also was found (p= 0.29 and p= 0.15, respectively). OJ
Groups (Groups 5, 6, 7 and 8) were compared in terms of serum NGAL and
Cystatin-C levels, and no significant difference was found for Cystatin-C
levels (p= 0.42) (Table 3).
However, within comparison analyses for OJ
Groups, the highest serum NGAL level was found in OJ Group 8 (p= 0.001) (Table
3, Figure 1).
Table 3. Comparisons of serum NGAL and Cystatin-C levels in non-OJ Groups and OJ Groups
Parameters (median, min-max)
|
Group 1
(control)
|
Group 2
(PNP 5 mmHg)
|
Group 3
(PNP 10 mmHg)
|
Group 4
(PNP 15 mmHg)
|
p
|
NGAL (ng/mL)
|
0.31 (0.22-0.57)
|
0.37 (0.30-0.62)
|
0.34 (0.25-0.50)
|
0.39 (0.34-0.75)
|
0.29
|
Cystatin-C (mg/dL)
|
0.14 (0.12-0.17)
|
0.17 (0.14-0.22)
|
0.14 (0.11-0.17)
|
0.14 (0.13-0.27)
|
0.15
|
|
Group 5
(OJ)
|
Group 6
(PNP 5 mmHg+OJ)
|
Group 7
(PNP 10 mmHg+OJ)
|
Group 8
(PNP 15 mmHg+OJ)
|
p
|
NGAL (ng/mL)
|
1.0 (0.61-1.21)
|
1.15 (1.09-1.27)
|
1.42 (1.14-1.53)
|
1.56 (1.44-1.70)
|
0.001
|
Cystatin-C (mg/dL)
|
0.16 (0.14-0.25)
|
0.20 (0.18-0.24)
|
0.21 (0.14-0.27)
|
0.19 (0.17-0.33)
|
0.42
|
PNP= pneumoperitoneum, OJ=
obstructive jaundice
There were no statistically significant
differences of serum Cystatin-C level comparison between non-OJ Group 1 and OJ
Group 5 (p= 0.13), non-OJ Group 2 and OJ Group 6 (p= 0.09). However, the levels
were significantly higher in OJ Groups 7 and 8 compared to non-OJ Groups 3 and
4 (p= 0.009 and p= 0.04, respectively) (Table 4, Figure 2). All OJ Groups
showed significantly higher serum NGAL levels compared to non-OJ Groups with
PNP (between non-OJ Group 1 and OJ Group 5, non-OJ Group 2 and OJ group 6,
non-OJ Group 3 and OJ Group 7, non-OJ Group 4 and OJ Group 8) (p= 0.002, for all comparisons) (Table 4, Figure 2).
Table 4. Comparisons of serum NGAL and Cystatin-C levels between non-OJ Groups and OJ Groups for pneumoperitoneum
Parameters (median, min-max)
|
Group 1
|
Group 5
|
p
|
Group 2
|
Group 6
|
p
|
NGAL (ng/mL)
|
0.31 (0.22-0.57)
|
1.0 (0.61-1.21)
|
0.002
|
0.37 (0.30-0.62)
|
1.15 (1.09-1.27)
|
0.002
|
Cystatin-C (mg/dL)
|
0.14 (0.12-0.17)
|
0.16 (0.14-0.25)
|
0.13
|
0.17 (0.14-0.22)
|
0.20 (0.18-0.24)
|
0.09
|
|
Group 3
|
Group 7
|
p
|
Group 4
|
Group 8
|
p
|
NGAL (ng/mL)
|
0.34 (0.25-0.50)
|
1.42 (1.14-1.53)
|
0.002
|
0.39 (0.34-0.75)
|
1.56 (1.44-1.70)
|
0.002
|
Cystatin-C (mg/dL)
|
0.14 (0.11-0.17)
|
0.21 (0.14-0.27)
|
0.009
|
0.14 (0.13-0.27)
|
0.19 (0.17-0.33)
|
0.04
|
Group 1: Control, Groups 2, 3, 4: Pneumoperitoneum
without obstructive jaundice, Group 5: Obstructive jaundice, Groups 6, 7, 8: Pneumoperitoneum with obstructive jaundice
Figure 2. The comparison of all groups for serum Cystatin-C levels
DISCUSSION
Laparoscopic interventions are widely used in
emergent and elective fields of surgery. Hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgeries
either for malign or benign obstructive causes, which are in advanced
laparoscopic surgery field, are increasingly being used in recent years (27-28).
The CO2 gas used in laparoscopic surgery is
revealing the operation area by providing the PNP and CO2 is preferable, due to
its superiority over as helium, Nitrogen protoxide, and argon (29,30).
Adverse effects of CO2 PNP on renal functions have been reported in several
studies (3-5,20,31,32). The underlying mechanisms were discussed as
increase in intra-abdominal pressure, hypercarbia, preoperative position of the
patient, and hemodynamic characteristics (4,8,10,33). The other
factors that might lead to AKI are reduced cardiac output, decrement in renal
blood flow and vein compression, increased renal vascular resistance,
vasopressin, endothelin, angiotensin-II, and secretion of vasoconstrictor
mediators such as catecholamine (3,5,6,7,9-12,14,34-36). To the best
of our knowledge, there was no study analyzing the effects of PNP with OJ on
renal functions.
Here in this experimental study, we first
examined the effects of PNP with OJ on liver enzymes. We found no significant
effect in PNP with OJ model on liver functions. Our results were similar to the
literature (37). In our study, besides the conventional biochemical
parameters used for renal functions, we also used new generation indicators
such as Cystatin-C and NGAL. Regarding the traditional renal function tests
such as Creatinine and BUN, we did not find any difference between group
analyses. In terms of to demonstrate the effect of PNP on kidney functions, the
comparison analyses between non-OJ Groups 2, 3, 4 with controls showed no
significant difference for serum NGAL levels. This result has led us to suggest
that PNP may not be a cause of AKI by itself if kidneys have no prior damage.
However, OJ Group 5 (control) showed higher NGAL levels compared to non-OJ
Groups with PNP (Groups 2, 3, 4). Moreover, OJ Groups with PNP (Groups 6, 7, 8)
revealed significantly higher levels of NGAL compared to PNP Groups and even
compared with the non-PNP OJ Group (Group 5). No significant differences were
observed between OJ Groups 6, 7, and 8 in comparison analyses. According to
these results, we can conclude that, the main bile duct obstructions may cause
renal damage and this effect may be increased with PNP of from the pressure
that is applied during the procedure. It is also emphasized by some authors
that renal functions deteriorate in patients with OJ with possible mechanisms
including reduced cardiac outflow, reduced peripheral vasoconstriction,
hypovolemia, increased renal vasoconstriction, and decrease in glomerular
filtration rate (38-40). Furthermore, it is also concluded that bile
acids and conjugate bilirubin may cause both ischemia and direct tubular
necrosis by itself in addition to possible damaging effect of PNP such as
increased on kidney structure (13,41).
There are several studies indicating the
superiority of Cystatin-C over Creatinine for evaluating glomerular filtration
rate (4,20,21). Here, we also found that serum Cystatin-C levels
significantly increased in OJ Groups 7 and 8, suggesting the rising levels of
Cystatin-C are more evident in pressures of 10 mmHg and above. Hence, keeping
PNP pressure under 10 mmHg or gasless laparoscopic techniques might be
considered as a suitable choice for patients who have prior kidney function
disorder.
Taken all these results together, in line with
the literature in various settings, our findings lead us to conclude that NGAL
and Cystatin-C levels are more sensitive in early recognition of renal damage
in laparoscopic surgery for the patients with OJ.
In conclusion, AKI is an important complication
in the context of laparoscopic surgeries for OJ. It seems like PNP is not an
indicator for AKI in these setting unless OJ is present. The matter of fact
that early phase of renal damage might not always be determined with
conventional biochemical methods. The use of renal novel biomarkers such as
Cystatin-C and serum NGAL, is suggested the
alternative way to early diagnosis of AKI and improve the post-operative
prognosis of the patient. We
believe that this experimental study might shed light on to develop prospective
clinical studies including the correlation of novel biomarkers with
histopathological changes in this area.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1) Kurukahvecioglu O,
Sare M, Karamercan A, Gunaydin B, Anadol Z, Tezel E. Intermittent pneumatic sequential compression of the lower
extremities restores the cerebral oxygen saturation during laparoscopic
cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2008; 22:907-11. doi:
10.1007/s00464-007-9505-4.
2) Sare M, Hamamci D,
Yilmaz I, Birincioglu M, Mentes BB, Ozmen M, et al. Effects of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum
on free radical formation in lung and liver tissues. Surg Endosc. 2002; 16:188-92. doi: 10.1007/s004640090103.
3) De Freitas Junior S,
Bustorff-Silva JM, Ramos CD, Brunetto SQ, da Costa APM, Antunes AG, et al. Scintigraphic Evaluation of the Impact of Pneumoperitoneum on Renal Blood Flow: A Rabbit
Model. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019;
29:1271-1275. doi:
10.1089/lap.2019.0194.
4) Kozan R, Şare
M, Yılmaz TU, Yüksel S, Şeneş M, Çaycı AB, et al. Effectiveness of new parameters in the
evaluation of pneumoperitoneum-related acute kidney injury in rats. Turk J
Med Sci. 2018; 48:1278-84. doi:
10.3906/sag-1602-124.
5) Abboud W, Bishara B, Nativ O, Awad H, Kinaneh S,
Abu-Salah N. Impact of Pneumoperitoneum on the Development of Acute Kidney
Injury: Comparison Between Normal and Diabetic Rats. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2020; 31:136-41. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000859.
6) Kirsch AJ, Hensle TW, Chang DT, Kayton ML,
Olsson CA, Sawczuk IS. Renal effects of CO2 insufflation: oliguria and acute
renal dysfunction in a rat pneumoperitoneum model. Urology. 1994; 43:453-9. doi:
10.1016/0090-4295(94)90230-5.
7) Schäfer M, Krähenbühl L. Effect of laparoscopy on intra-abdominal blood flow.
Surgery. 2001; 129:385-9. doi: 10.1067/msy.2001.110224.
8) Junghans T, Böhm B, Gründel K, Schwenk W, Müller JM. Does pneumoperitoneum with different gases, body
positions, and intraperitoneal pressures influence renal and hepatic blood
flow? Surgery. 1997; 121:206-11. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6060(97)90291-9.
9) Windberger U, Siegl H, Woisetschläger R, Schrenk P, Podesser B, Losert U. Hemodynamic changes during prolonged laparoscopic surgery. Eur Surg Res. 1994; 26:1-9. doi: 10.1159/000129312.
10) Razvi HA, Fields D, Vargas JC, Vaughan ED
Jr, Vukasin A, Sosa RE. Oliguria during laparoscopic surgery: evidence for
direct renal parenchymal compression as an etiologic factor. J Endourol. 1996; 10:1-4. doi: 10.1089/end.1996.10.1.
11) Dolgor B, Kitano S, Yoshida T, Bandoh T, Ninomiya K, Matsumoto T. Vasopressin antagonist
improves renal function in a rat model of pneumoperitoneum. J Surg Res. 1998; 79:109-14. doi:
10.1006/jsre.1998.5409.
12) Hamilton BD, Chow GK, Inman SR, Stowe NT,
Winfield HN. Increased intra-abdominal pressure during pneumoperitoneum
stimulates endothelin release in a canine model. J Endourol. 1998; 12:193-7. doi:
10.1089/end.1998.12.193.
13) Ozozan OV, Dinc T, Vural V, Ozogul C, Ozmen MM, Coskun F. An electron
microscopy study of liver and kidney damage in an experimental model of
obstructive jaundice. Ann Ital Chir. 2020; 91:122-30.
14) Rege RV. Adverse effects of biliary
obstruction: implications for treatment of patients with obstructive jaundice. AJR
Am J Roentgenol. 1995;
164:287-93. doi:
10.2214/ajr.164.2.7839957.
15) Fogarty BJ, Parks RW, Rowlands BJ, Diamond
T. Renal dysfunction in obstructive jaundice. Br J Surg. 1995;
82:877-84. doi:
10.1002/bjs.1800820707.
16) Rodrigo R, Avalos N, Orellana M, Bosco C,
Thielemann L. Renal effects of experimental obstructive jaundice: morphological
and functional assessment. Arch Med Res. 1999; 30:275-85. doi:
10.1016/s0188-0128(99)00027-5.
17) Mussap M, Ruzzante N, Varagnolo M, Plebani M. Quantitative automated particle-enhanced
immunonephelometric assay for the routinary measurement of human cystatin C. Clin
Chem Lab Med. 1998; 36:859-65. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.1998.151.
18) Filler G, Bökenkamp A, Hofmann W, Le Bricon T, Martínez-Brú C, Grubb A.
Cystatin C as a marker of GFR--history, indications, and future research. Clin Biochem. 2005; 38:1-8. doi:
10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2004.09.025.
19) Laterza OF, Price
CP, Scott MG. Cystatin C: an improved estimator of glomerular filtration rate? Clin
Chem. 2002; 48:699-707.
20) Lima RM, Navarro LH, Nakamura G, Solanki DR,
Castiglia YM, Vianna PT, et al. Serum cystatin C is a sensitive early marker
for changes in the glomerular filtration rate in patients undergoing
laparoscopic surgery. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2014; 69:378-83. doi:
10.6061/clinics/2014(06)02.
21) Dharnidharka VR,
Kwon C, Stevens G. Serum cystatin C is superior to serum creatinine as a marker
of kidney function: a meta-analysis. Am J
Kidney Dis. 2002; 40:221-6. doi:
10.1053/ajkd.2002.34487.
22) Cowland JB,
Borregaard N. Molecular characterization and pattern of tissue expression of
the gene for neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin from humans. Genomics. 1997; 45:17-23. doi:
10.1006/geno.1997.4896.
23) Nguyen MT, Devarajan P. Biomarkers for the
early detection of acute kidney injury. Pediatr Nephrol. 2008; 23:2151-7. doi: 10.1007/s00467-007-0470-x.
24) O'Neill P, Wait RB, Kahng KU. Obstructive
jaundice and renal failure in the rat: the role of renal prostaglandins and the
renin-angiotensin system. Surgery. 1990; 108:356-62.
25) Devarajan P. Neutrophil
gelatinase-associated lipocalin: a promising biomarker for human acute kidney
injury. Biomark Med. 2010; 4:265-80. doi: 10.1007/s00467-014-2989-y.
26) Moriya H, Mochida Y, Ishioka K, Oka M, Maesato K, Hidaka S, et al. Plasma neutrophil
gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) is an indicator of interstitial damage
and a predictor of kidney function worsening of chronic kidney disease in the
early stage: a pilot study. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2017; 21:1053-9. doi:
10.1007/s10157-017-1402-0.
27) Hajibandeh S, Hajibandeh S, Sarma DR, Balakrishnan S, Eltair M, Mankotia R, et al. Laparoscopic Transcystic Versus Transductal Common Bile Duct
Exploration: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. World J Surg. 2019;
43:1935-48. doi:
10.1007/s00268-019-05005-y.
28) Liu M, Ji S, Xu W, Liu W, Qin Y, Hu Q, et
al. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: are the best times coming? World J
Surg Oncol. 2019; 17:81. doi: 10.1186/s12957-019-1624-6.
29) Eichel L, McDougall E, Clayman R. Basics of
Laparoscopic Urologic Surgery. In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, editors. Campbell’s Urology. 9th ed.
Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2007. p. 171-220.
30) Leighton TA, Liu SY, Bongard FS. Comparative cardiopulmonary effects of carbon dioxide versus helium
pneumoperitoneum. Surgery. 1993; 113:527-31.
31) Sassa N, Hattori R, Yamamoto T, Kato M,
Komatsu T, Matsukawa Y, et al. Direct visualization of renal hemodynamics
affected by carbon dioxide-induced pneumoperitoneum. Urology. 2009; 73:311-5. doi:
10.1016/j.urology.2008.09.047.
32) Bishara B, Karram T, Khatib S, Ramadan R,
Schwartz H, Hoffman A, et al. Impact of pneumoperitoneum on renal perfusion and
excretory function: beneficial effects of nitroglycerine. Surg Endosc. 2009; 23:568-76. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9881-4.
33) Demyttenaere S,
Feldman LS, Fried GM. Effect of pneumoperitoneum on renal perfusion and
function: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2007; 21:152-60. doi:
10.1007/s00464-006-0250-x.
34) Zacherl J, Thein E, Stangl M, Feussner H, Bock S, Mittlböck M,
et al. The influence of periarterial papaverine application
on intraoperative renal function and blood flow during laparoscopic donor
nephrectomy in a pig model. Surg Endosc. 2003; 17:1231-6. doi:
10.1007/s00464-002-8835-5.
35) Ambrose JA, Onders RP, Stowe NT, Simonson MS, Robinson AV, Wilhelm S, et al. Pneumoperitoneum
upregulates preproendothelin-1 messenger RNA. Surg Endosc. 2001; 15:183-8. doi:
10.1007/s004640000313.
36) Gudmundsson FF, Viste A, Myking OL, Bostad
L, Grong K, Svanes K. Role of angiotensin II under prolonged increased
intraabdominal pressure (IAP) in pigs. Surg Endosc. 2003; 17:1092-7. doi:
10.1007/s00464-002-9123-0.
37) Bostanci EB, Yol S, Teke Z, Kayaalp C, Sakaogullari Z, Ozel Turkcu U, et al. Effects of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum
on hepatic function in obstructive jaundice: an experimental study in a rat
model. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2010;
395:667-76. doi:
10.1007/s00423-009-0577-6.
38) Wu F, Duan H, Xie Y. Preventive Effects of
Dexmedetomidine on Renal Dysfunction and Hemodynamic Stability in Malignant
Obstructive Jaundice Patients During Peri-Operative Period. Med Sci Monit. 2019; 25:6782-7. doi: 10.12659/MSM.916329.
39) Naranjo A, Cruz A,
López P, Chicano M, Martín-Malo A, Sitges-Serra A, et al. Renal function after dopamine and fluid
administration in patients with malignant obstructive jaundice. A prospective randomized study. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2011; 20:161-7.
40) Kong EL, Zhang JM, An N, Tao Y, Yu WF, Wu
FX. Spironolactone rescues renal dysfunction in obstructive jaundice rats by
upregulating ACE2 expression. J Cell Commun Signal. 2019; 13:17-26. doi:
10.1007/s12079-018-0466-2.
41) Green J, Better OS. Systemic hypotension and renal failure in obstructive jaundice-mechanistic and therapeutic aspects.J Am Soc Nephrol. 1995; 5:1853-71.